top of page
TR White Text - White A.png

Mahomes, Allen and Kelce Own the AI Endorsement Answer. Most of the NFL Doesn't Exist to It.

  • Writer: Talent Resources
    Talent Resources
  • 3 hours ago
  • 7 min read
Mahomes, Allen and Kelce Own the AI Endorsement Answer. Most of the NFL Doesn't Exist to It.
5W and Talent Resources scored 50 NFL players on AI Citation Share across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity ahead of the September 9, 2026 season opener.

Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen and Travis Kelce command the largest share of endorsement-intent AI answers among the 50 NFL players evaluated by 5W and Talent Resources ahead of the 2026 season opener on September 9. The top five players account for 61% of all citations recorded, while more than half of the group scores in the single digits despite active roster positions and national television exposure.


This report applies the same four-dimension scoring model used by Talent Resources and 5W for the In Tune With AI athlete research (May 2026) and the Creator Documentation Index (June 2026). The model has been expanded to cover a 50-player NFL cohort, with publication timed to coincide with the kickoff-week news cycle.


01

Five players account for 61% of citation share. Mahomes, Allen, Kelce, Darnold and Walker dominate endorsement-intent AI responses across the complete pool of 50 players tested.


02

Six players in the kickoff matchup receive a recency lift. Players from the Seahawks and Patriots—the two teams competing in the September 9 rematch of Super Bowl LX—appear disproportionately near the top. However, the effect does not benefit every player on the rematch rosters equally.


03

17% of answers reference a fabricated or outdated deal. This fabrication rate falls between the 18% recorded in the Celebrity Endorsement Index and the 22% found in the Beauty AI Endorsement Index.


04

28 of the 50 players score below 15. This group includes several Pro Bowl selections at offensive line and cornerback—positions AI engines rarely mention in a sponsor-facing context, regardless of on-field performance.


Where Citation Share Concentrates
30 of 50 players land in the bottom tier
Every player was placed into one of four tiers based on Citation Share Score: Retrieval Anchor, Cited, Moderate, and Recoverable, the same tier system used across the 5W AI Visibility Index series.

5
9
6
30
Retrieval Anchor (5 players)
Cited (9 players)
Moderate (6 players)
Recoverable (30 players)
Six of every ten players tested fall into the lowest tier, Recoverable, meaning AI engines rarely name them unprompted in a sponsor-facing context.

"The kickoff matchup between the Seahawks and Patriots is doing more for four players' AI visibility than a full season of highlights for players on other rosters. Brands evaluating a fourth-quarter endorsement deal should know which players AI engines are already naming, and which ones AI engines are naming incorrectly."

Ronn Torossian · Founder, 5W


Methodology


The four signals behind every score


Each of the 50 players was evaluated across four weighted dimensions, following the methodology that Talent Resources and 5W validated in two previous joint studies. Standardized sponsor-facing and fan-facing prompt sets were run across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity between August 18 and August 24, 2026.


30%
AI Recognition
Whether an engine names the player unprompted in response to a category query.

25%
Association Sentiment
Whether the surrounding language is commercially favorable, neutral, or negative.

25%
Engagement Depth
Whether the engine cites specific deals, statistics, or storylines rather than a bare name.

20%
Cross-Engine Consistency
How many of the four engines return the same player for the same prompt.

Scores are directional and modeled: they represent a standardized snapshot of engine behavior during the test window, not a permanent ranking. AI engines update continuously and answers vary by session and prompt phrasing, consistent with the disclosure language used across the 5W AI Visibility Index series.


Complete Rankings


The full field: all 50 players ranked


The top five entries are highlighted. Scroll to view the complete pool.

Rank

Player

Team

Score

Engines

Tier

1

Patrick Mahomes

Kansas City Chiefs

97

4/4

Retrieval Anchor

2

Josh Allen

Buffalo Bills

94

4/4

Retrieval Anchor

3

Travis Kelce

Kansas City Chiefs

91

4/4

Retrieval Anchor

4

Sam Darnold

Seattle Seahawks

89

4/4

Retrieval Anchor

5

Kenneth Walker III

Seattle Seahawks

87

4/4

Retrieval Anchor

6

Lamar Jackson

Baltimore Ravens

86

4/4

Cited

7

Ja'Marr Chase

Cincinnati Bengals

82

4/4

Cited

8

Justin Jefferson

Minnesota Vikings

80

4/4

Cited

9

Cooper Kupp

Seattle Seahawks

78

4/4

Cited

10

Joe Burrow

Cincinnati Bengals

76

4/4

Cited

11

Drake Maye

New England Patriots

74

4/4

Cited

12

Tyreek Hill

Miami Dolphins

71

3/4

Cited

13

CeeDee Lamb

Dallas Cowboys

69

3/4

Cited

14

Saquon Barkley

Philadelphia Eagles

67

3/4

Cited

15

A.J. Brown

Philadelphia Eagles

63

3/4

Moderate

16

Myles Garrett

Cleveland Browns

60

3/4

Moderate

17

Christian Gonzalez

New England Patriots

57

3/4

Moderate

18

Nick Bosa

San Francisco 49ers

54

3/4

Moderate

19

Trevor Lawrence

Jacksonville Jaguars

49

2/4

Moderate

20

Bijan Robinson

Atlanta Falcons

45

2/4

Moderate

21

Puka Nacua

Los Angeles Rams

41

2/4

Recoverable

22

T.J. Watt

Pittsburgh Steelers

38

2/4

Recoverable

23

Jordan Love

Green Bay Packers

34

2/4

Recoverable

24

George Pickens

Dallas Cowboys

29

1/4

Recoverable

25

Jason Myers

Seattle Seahawks

12

1/4

Recoverable

26

Derrick Henry

Baltimore Ravens

11

1/4

Recoverable

27

Amon-Ra St. Brown

Detroit Lions

10

1/4

Recoverable

28

Jared Goff

Detroit Lions

9

1/4

Recoverable

29

Brock Purdy

San Francisco 49ers

9

1/4

Recoverable

30

George Kittle

San Francisco 49ers

8

1/4

Recoverable

31

DeVonta Smith

Philadelphia Eagles

8

1/4

Recoverable

32

Jonathan Taylor

Indianapolis Colts

7

1/4

Recoverable

33

C.J. Stroud

Houston Texans

7

1/4

Recoverable

34

Nico Collins

Houston Texans

6

1/4

Recoverable

35

Baker Mayfield

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

6

1/4

Recoverable

36

Mike Evans

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

5

0/4

Recoverable

37

Kyler Murray

Arizona Cardinals

5

0/4

Recoverable

38

Marvin Harrison Jr.

Arizona Cardinals

4

0/4

Recoverable

39

Trey McBride

Arizona Cardinals

4

0/4

Recoverable

40

Matthew Stafford

Los Angeles Rams

4

0/4

Recoverable

41

Malik Nabers

New York Giants

3

0/4

Recoverable

42

Garrett Wilson

New York Jets

3

0/4

Recoverable

43

Sauce Gardner

New York Jets

3

0/4

Recoverable

44

Caleb Williams

Chicago Bears

2

0/4

Recoverable

45

Brock Bowers

Las Vegas Raiders

2

0/4

Recoverable

46

Maxx Crosby

Las Vegas Raiders

2

0/4

Recoverable

47

Justin Herbert

Los Angeles Chargers

1

0/4

Recoverable

48

Derwin James

Los Angeles Chargers

1

0/4

Recoverable

49

Rashee Rice

Kansas City Chiefs

1

0/4

Recoverable

50

Zack Martin

Dallas Cowboys

0

0/4

Recoverable

Source: 5W and Talent Resources GEO audit, August 2026. Directional modeled estimates across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity.


KICKOFF EFFECT

The kickoff rematch lifts four players but leaves two behind


Six players from the two teams competing in the NFL's September 9 season-opening rematch of Super Bowl LX are included in this Index. Four of them—Darnold, Walker, Kupp and Maye—rank within the top eleven. Gonzalez and Myers score lower, despite delivering standout performances in that same game.


Seattle Seahawks · QB
Sam Darnold
89 rank 4
Seattle Seahawks · RB
Kenneth Walker III
87 rank 5
Seattle Seahawks · WR
Cooper Kupp
78 rank 9
New England Patriots · QB
Drake Maye
74 rank 11
New England Patriots · CB
Christian Gonzalez
57 rank 17
Seattle Seahawks · K
Jason Myers
12 rank 25

Gonzalez, the Patriots cornerback who forced two turnovers in that Super Bowl, scores 57. Myers, who converted a Super Bowl-record five field goals in the same game, scores only 12—the lowest mark among the top 25.


Super Bowl LX, by the numbers


Seattle Seahawks 29, New England Patriots 13. Played on February 8, 2026, at Levi's Stadium. Attendance: 70,823. U.S. television viewership: 124.9 million. Cost of a 30-second commercial: $10 million. Halftime performer: Bad Bunny, featuring Lady Gaga and Ricky Martin. Source: Super Bowl LX record.


Why it works


The pattern aligns with how generative engines weigh recent, widely reported events alongside career-long fame. A February 2026 Super Bowl appearance—covered by NFL.com, CBS News and wire services within the retrieval windows used by most AI engines—is the most likely explanation for the citation advantage enjoyed by Darnold, Walker, Kupp and Maye over players with comparable career statistics but no recent title-game coverage.


Business Implications


17% of AI answers cite the wrong NFL sponsor deal


The 17% fabrication rate recorded in this Index is not distributed evenly. Players who experienced multiple sponsor changes within the past 18 months receive lower Association Sentiment scores because engines display outdated pairings alongside current ones, weakening the clarity of the active deal. This reflects a documentation gap, not a lack of popularity.


Why it works


Large language models produce the statistically likely continuation of a sponsor-athlete pairing using training data that may predate a contract's expiration or renegotiation. Without a dated, structured update to the player's public sponsorship record, the model receives no signal that the pairing has changed and continues to cite the previous deal.


"Talent Resources has spent two decades building the relationships that put an athlete in front of a brand. This Index adds a new layer to that work: knowing which players AI is already recommending, and which ones need their record built out before a deal ever gets discussed."

Mike Heller · Founder and CEO, Talent Resources


Frequently Asked Questions


1. What is the NFL Kickoff AI Endorsement Index 2026?


The NFL Kickoff AI Endorsement Index 2026 is a research study by 5W and Talent Resources that evaluates the AI Citation Share of 50 NFL players across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. It measures how frequently and accurately AI engines mention players in sponsor-facing and fan-facing responses.


2. Which NFL players ranked highest in the Index?


Patrick Mahomes ranked first with a score of 97, followed by Josh Allen with 94 and Travis Kelce with 91. Sam Darnold and Kenneth Walker III completed the top five with scores of 89 and 87, respectively.


3. How much citation share did the top five NFL players capture?


The top five players captured 61% of all endorsement-intent citations recorded across the complete 50-player group.


4. How were the NFL players evaluated?


Each player was assessed using four weighted dimensions: AI Recognition at 30%, Association Sentiment at 25%, Engagement Depth at 25% and Cross-Engine Consistency at 20%.



5. Which AI platforms were included in the research?


The standardized prompts were tested across four generative AI platforms: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity.


6. When was the research conducted?


The prompts were run between August 18 and August 24, 2026. The report was published on August 26, 2026, ahead of the September 9 season opener.


7. What does the Recoverable tier mean?


Recoverable is the lowest of the four Citation Share tiers. Players in this tier are rarely mentioned without prompting by AI engines in a sponsor-facing context. Thirty of the 50 players tested were placed in this tier.


8. How accurate were AI-generated answers about NFL sponsorship deals?


The study found that 17% of AI-generated answers referenced an expired, renegotiated or nonexistent sponsor deal. The report identifies this as a documentation gap rather than a popularity problem.


9. How did the kickoff rematch affect player visibility?


Six players from the Seahawks and Patriots were included in the Index. Four—Sam Darnold, Kenneth Walker III, Cooper Kupp and Drake Maye—ranked within the top eleven, suggesting that recent and widely covered events can strengthen AI visibility.


10. Are the Index scores permanent rankings?


No. The scores are directional, modeled estimates representing a standardized snapshot of AI engine behavior during the testing period. AI engines update continuously, and responses can vary by session and prompt wording.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page